Cold Email Deliverability without Open Tracking
Why 58% of cold emails fail and how removing tracking fixes it
brought to you by Sales.co
The cold email agency your favorite brands use.
Most B2B sales teams are unknowingly sabotaging their own cold email campaigns. While they obsess over subject lines and personalization, a hidden culprit is sending their carefully crafted emails straight to spam folders: open tracking pixels.
If you're tracking email opens, you're likely destroying your deliverability. Here's why and how to fix it immediately.
The Hidden Problem: How Open Tracking Kills Your Deliverability
Open tracking works by embedding an invisible 1x1 pixel image into every email you send. When a recipient opens your email, this pixel loads from your server, registering as an open. Seems harmless, right?
Wrong.
The Spam Filter Reality
Email service providers like Gmail and Outlook have become incredibly sophisticated at detecting sales and promotional emails. When they see that tracking pixel, they immediately flag your email as:
• Commercial/promotional content
• Mass email communicatio
n• Potential spam
The result? Your email gets filtered before it ever reaches your prospect's inbox.
The Apple Mail Problem
Apple dominates the email client market with 58.96% market share. In 2021, Apple introduced Mail Privacy Protection, which automatically pre-loads tracking pixels whether the recipient actually opens the email or not.
This means:
• Your open tracking data is completely inaccurate for most recipients
• You're triggering spam filters for worthless data
• You're making deliverability decisions based on false metrics
The Performance Data: What Happens When You Remove Tracking
We analyzed over 100,000 cold emails sent by B2B agencies and found stark differences between tracked and untracked emails:
Deliverability Metrics
With Open Tracking:
• Inbox placement rate: 42%
• Spam folder rate: 47%
• Blocked/filtered rate: 11%
Without Open Tracking:
• Inbox placement rate: 78%
• Spam folder rate: 18%
• Blocked/filtered rate: 4%
Result: 86% improvement in inbox placement simply by removing tracking pixels.
Real Response Rates
Since you can't fake responses (unlike opens), reply rates tell the real story:
With Open Tracking:
• Average response rate: 3.2%
• Positive response rate: 1.8%
Without Open Tracking:
• Average response rate: 8.7%
• Positive response rate: 5.1%
Result: 172% increase in actual responses without tracking.
Why Open Rates Don't Matter (And What to Track Instead)
The Vanity Metric Problem
Open rates have become the vanity metric of cold email. They make you feel good but don't correlate with business results. Here's why:
• Inaccurate data: Apple Mail, image blocking, and preview panes skew results
• No business value: Opens don't pay your bills—responses and meetings do
• False optimization: You optimize for opens instead of replies
What Actually Matters: The Response-First Framework
Focus on these metrics instead:
Primary Metrics (Revenue-Driving):
• Positive response rate: Interested replies/total emails sent
• Meeting booking rate: Scheduled calls/total emails sent
• Pipeline contribution: Deals generated/total emails sent
Secondary Metrics (Diagnostic):
• Bounce rate: Invalid emails (should be <2%)
• Unsubscribe rate: People opting out (should be <0.5%)
• Spam complaint rate: Recipients marking as spam (should be <0.1%)
By removing open tracking and focusing on response-driven metrics, you'll:
• Dramatically improve deliverability (78% vs 42% inbox placement)
• Increase actual response rates (8.7% vs 3.2% replies)
• Build stronger prospect relationships through authentic communicatio
n• Future-proof your outreach against privacy changes
The companies that make this shift now will dominate cold email while their competitors wonder why their campaigns stopped working.
Related tactics
Looking for more tiny marketing wins? Here are some related marketing ideas that might help.